Resourcesicon
Make Customer Content Count: Centralize, Tag, and Track
Graphic with videos, microphones, and paper icons with large magnifying glass in the center symbolizing lots of content.

Make Customer Content Count: Centralize, Tag, and Track

There are so many ways to tell your company’s story through your customers. And the stories are out there along with customers willing to tell them in one form or another. But companies continue to struggle when it comes to getting those captured stories—customer content—into buyers’ hands.

The Case for Customer Content

According to a recent trend report from the Content Marketing Institute, 85% of B2B organizations attribute their success to content marketing.  Customer-based content, such as a case study or video testimonial, serves to validate that a product or service works as advertised and addresses the prospect’s business need.  In fact, the Second Annual State of Sales report from Salesforce.com notes that 57% of survey respondents listed high-quality content as an important sales driver.

In a recent study by research firm Televerde, more customer content was the fourth highest response from B2B salespeople to the question, What can Marketing do to help you win more deals?

- 1 Better Messaging
- 2 More Qualified Leads
- 3 Better Marketing materials
- 4 More Case Studies and Testimonials

A solid benefit of written or recorded content is that it multiplies the customer’s investment in telling their story.  A customer can provide an interview for a video or case study illustrating their success with the potential for it to be used over and over again without additional time commitment.  Preventing overuse of your VIP customers helps ensure you can still tap them for one-on-one calls or site visits when they’re needed to seal deals.

Barriers to ROI

So where do you tell your Sales and Marketing to find content? Most likely the answer is not simple. The content is likely scattered between the company website, Dropbox folders, intranet drives, etc. Further they probably aren’t tagged in a way that supports the kinds of searches commonly used to support specific opportunities and marketing campaigns. Your internal content consumers don’t have the time or inclination to rummage around for the perfect story or piece of content.  They need a sophisticated yet simple-to-use way to search and share customer content capability built right into the CRM solution they already use. The right application puts the right content at the right time just a few clicks away.

The Solution

A purpose-built application for storing, categorizing, sharing, and measuring content impact on opportunities is a huge advantage for people who leverage it (and those who develop content). By efficiently locating the most salient customer content to address a prospect’s concerns at any given point in the sales cycle, salespeople can optimize their time and move prospects forward. Content helps build a context for buyers of how your customers use your solution and the types of business problems that were solved.  Setting the stage with customer content means that live calls that occur later in the sales process are more informed and useful.

When selecting the right application to enable your content curation and sharing capability, keep these two things in mind:

  1. You should have a single, centralized “library” where all content is stored and accessed. A single, easily accessible repository for all your content is non-negotiable.  Without it, you and your users will never know if you have the most appropriate or current content available. A central location also makes it easier to identify gaps in your content collection. We believe strongly in using your CRM solution as that central location since all CRM users then have access.  For Sales the most relevant content should be surfaced and recommended right on the opportunity page.
  2. You must have the ability to track the use of your content and tie that use to sales outcomes. If you are not able to track content usage back to an opportunity, then all the money and effort exerted to create the content cannot be justified to CxOs. Gone are the days when marketing was judged by the quantity of collateral it produced alone.  You also need to know if your content is contributing to revenue and what specific content is resonating in the market so you can produce more of it.

It Started With a Legitimate Aspiration

It's only natural that many advocacy leaders have landed on the same objective: make the program easier to use by meeting users where they're already working.

Today, that increasingly means Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or whatever generative AI assistant employees happen to have open.

Imagine a salesperson simply asking AI, "Find me three German healthcare customers using product Y, willing to speak with a prospect," instead of navigating to another interface, or waiting for someone from advocacy, or elsewhere, to respond. It's easy to see the appeal. Removing friction has always been one of the fastest ways to increase adoption.

It is exactly the right instinct.

The difficult parts, arguably the reason program managers exist, occur before and after AI says, "Here are your three best matches."

The value advocacy professionals bring is the ability to operationalize and scale customer advocacy for maximum impact. Quality advocate information doesn't just appear, it's the result of a system.

What's Next?

Now that the user has three advocates, what should happen?

  • Should they email the customer directly?
  • Should they contact the Customer Success Manager first?
  • The account executive for one of the accounts was about to make a request. Was that considered?
  • Has anyone noticed that this customer has already participated in three activities in the last 60 days?
  • Are they currently navigating a difficult support issue?
  • Did they recently decline another invitation?
  • Would someone else actually be a better choice?

Notice what happened. The search was completed.

The next steps are just as manual as ever if AI search is the be all, end all.

Reality Check
AI can tell you who could participate. It can't tell you who should participate unless someone (or something) has been keeping score.

Haven't We Seen This Movie Before?

This is where the story starts to feel strangely familiar.

Many companies still operate their program using spreadsheets, scattered CRM fields, shared drives, email folders, and the remarkable memories of a handful of program managers.

Eventually, organizations realize they aren't managing an advocacy program at all. They're managing lists that happen to contain advocates.

But the shortcomings are real:

  • A spreadsheet might tell you that Sarah from ABC Company has spoken at a conference. It couldn't tell you that she'd spoken three times already this quarter.
  • Custom CRM fields could tell you a customer was referenceable. They alone couldn't coordinate approvals, notify relationship owners, recognize participation, measure outcomes, or attribute revenue.

Purpose-built advocacy platforms emerged because advocacy is much more than a search problem.

Ironically, AI has convinced some organizations to revisit the same shortcut they worked so hard to escape.

When Search Replaces Process

Let's imagine two different worlds.

In the first, AI recommends an advocate for a sales call.

  1. A request is automatically created.
  2. The Customer Success Manager approves participation.
  3. The customer receives preparation materials.
  4. The call takes place.
  5. The activity is recorded.
  6. Recognition is issued.
  7. The opportunity is linked to the advocacy activity.
  8. If the deal closes, revenue attribution updates automatically.
  9. Executive dashboards reflect the contribution.

Months later, AI knows this customer recently participated and may deserve a break before being asked again.

Now imagine the second world.

  1. AI recommends the same advocate.
  2. The salesperson sends an email.
  3. The customer agrees.
  4. The meeting happens.
  5. Everyone moves on.

Three months later someone asks how many customer reference contributed to the revenue this quarter.

Silence. Nobody really knows.

The advocacy happened...hopefully. The program didn't. Collectively, the organization slowly stopped feeding the very system it depended on to understand its advocacy program.

Reality Check
If AI helps facilitate twenty closed-won opportunities this quarter, but none are recorded, your executive dashboard still says zero.

Invisible Work Stays Invisible

One of the easiest mistakes to make in an AI-first world is assuming that successful interactions somehow become organizational knowledge on their own.

They don't.

If a customer agrees to speak with a prospect and nobody records it, the organization loses far more than a single activity.

  • It loses context, attribution, and recognition.
  • It loses another piece of history that could have helped improve the next decision.

The most valuable advocacy data isn't simply who your customers are.

It's everything they've done.

  • Every request, acceptance/decline, event presentation, analyst interview, product beta, reference call, press interview, reward, closed-won opportunity revenue influenced by their participation.

That's the story AI actually wants to read.

AI Needs Memory, Not Just Data

It's often said that AI needs good data.

That's true.

But operational history is far more valuable than static customer information.

  • Advocate profiles answer questions about who someone is.
  • Operational history answers questions about what consistently works.
  • That's where AI begins uncovering insights that no spreadsheet could ever reveal.
  • Perhaps healthcare advocates participate twice as often as financial services advocates.
  • Perhaps customers who join advisory boards are twice as likely to become conference speakers.
  • Maybe advocates who receive recognition within a week participate significantly more often than those who don't.

Those aren't search results.Those are patterns.

  • Patterns emerge from history.
  • History emerges from process.
  • Process emerges from systems.

Remove any one of those pieces and AI becomes little more than an exceptionally fast search engine.

Reality Check
Every workflow skipped today is a pattern AI won't discover tomorrow.

Don't Stop at "Who?"

The AI revolution has created tremendous excitement, and rightly so. Finding the right advocate is becoming dramatically easier than it was only a few years ago.

That's worth celebrating.

Just don't confuse a better search experience with a better advocacy program. Search is only one chapter in the story.

The organizations that see the greatest return from AI won't necessarily be the ones with the most sophisticated models.

They'll be the ones with the richest operational history.

  • Every request becomes institutional memory.
  • Every activity measured.
  • Every contribution attributable.
  • Every outcome becomes another lesson AI can learn from.

Those organizations won't use AI merely to answer the question, "Who should we ask?"

They'll use AI to answer far more valuable questions.

  • "Where are we running short of advocates?"
  • "When is the most effective time to use advocates?"
  • "What types of advocacy generate the greatest business impact?"
  • "What patterns have we been missing?"

That's when AI stops behaving like a better Google search.

That's when it starts behaving like a strategic partner.

Finding the right advocate has always been the opening scene.

If your AI can find advocates but your program can't learn from using them, you've built a remarkable search engine instead of a remarkable advocacy program.