Resourcesicon
How to Use AI Without Losing the Humanity | CMA Podcast

How to Use AI Without Losing the Humanity | CMA Podcast

About this Episode

Featured Guest: Darren Smith

In this episode of The CustomerX Files, Alison sits down with Darren Smith, CTO at Point of Reference, for a candid, behind-the-scenes look at how AI is reshaping the world of Customer Advocacy and Customer Marketing. This conversation is packed with practical, real-world insights. Darren shares powerful ways AI can elevate your day-to-day work.

Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant concept or futuristic tool — it’s becoming embedded into everyday workflows, customer interactions, and marketing strategies. Yet with its rapid adoption comes a real concern: how do we integrate AI in ways that enhance our work instead of diluting the empathy, nuance, and authenticity that only humans can bring? In this episode, Darren and Alison unpack this complex balance, walking through both the opportunities and the guardrails necessary for success.

Darren brings a unique perspective as a technology leader deeply embedded in the technical evolution of customer advocacy. He and Alison unpack how AI is currently being used behind the scenes to accelerate processes — from data retrieval and analytics to personalization and predictive insights — and they emphasize that AI’s true value lies not in replacing humans, but in augmenting the work humans already do best.

AI can Enhance Customer Advocacy Efforts

Throughout the episode, Darren and Alison emphasize a simple but powerful principle: AI should be treated as a tool — not a replacement — for what humans do best. They explore how customer marketers and advocacy leaders can use AI to enhance program outcomes without losing sight of the personal relationships that drive long-term engagement and loyalty.

Listeners will find real-world examples of where AI can be applied thoughtfully and where caution is warranted. Darren discusses how AI can support teams by:

  • Streamlining workflow efficiencies — such as summarizing customer feedback, generating first drafts of content, or analyzing trends from large datasets — so humans can focus on higher-value activities.
  • Enabling better prioritization — freeing up time from repetitive tasks and helping teams spend more energy on building authentic connections with advocates and customers.
  • Improving decision-making with data — turning raw customer data into insights that inform strategy while still requiring human interpretation and emotional intelligence.

But this episode doesn’t just focus on the “what” it also digs into the “how.” Darren offers thoughtful guidance on questions like:

  • Where should AI fit into your team’s workflow?
  • How do you maintain your brand’s voice, tone, and human authenticity when adopting AI tools?
  • What are the ethical considerations of using AI with customers and advocates?

By sharing actionable examples and thoughtful frameworks, Darren helps demystify the role of AI in customer advocacy and marketing while reinforcing that human intuition, empathy, and relationship building remain irreplaceable.

Whether you’re just beginning to explore AI tools, or you’re already integrating them into your day-to-day operations, this episode will expand your thinking and equip you with strategies to use AI responsibly and effectively — without losing the humanity that makes your customer programs meaningful and impactful.

Listen now to gain practical insights on how to strike the right balance between intelligent automation and human connection — and discover how AI can be a strategic enabler, not a substitute, in your customer engagement journey.

It Started With a Legitimate Aspiration

It's only natural that many advocacy leaders have landed on the same objective: make the program easier to use by meeting users where they're already working.

Today, that increasingly means Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or whatever generative AI assistant employees happen to have open.

Imagine a salesperson simply asking AI, "Find me three German healthcare customers using product Y, willing to speak with a prospect," instead of navigating to another interface, or waiting for someone from advocacy, or elsewhere, to respond. It's easy to see the appeal. Removing friction has always been one of the fastest ways to increase adoption.

It is exactly the right instinct.

The difficult parts, arguably the reason program managers exist, occur before and after AI says, "Here are your three best matches."

The value advocacy professionals bring is the ability to operationalize and scale customer advocacy for maximum impact. Quality advocate information doesn't just appear, it's the result of a system.

What's Next?

Now that the user has three advocates, what should happen?

  • Should they email the customer directly?
  • Should they contact the Customer Success Manager first?
  • The account executive for one of the accounts was about to make a request. Was that considered?
  • Has anyone noticed that this customer has already participated in three activities in the last 60 days?
  • Are they currently navigating a difficult support issue?
  • Did they recently decline another invitation?
  • Would someone else actually be a better choice?

Notice what happened. The search was completed.

The next steps are just as manual as ever if AI search is the be all, end all.

Reality Check
AI can tell you who could participate. It can't tell you who should participate unless someone (or something) has been keeping score.

Haven't We Seen This Movie Before?

This is where the story starts to feel strangely familiar.

Many companies still operate their program using spreadsheets, scattered CRM fields, shared drives, email folders, and the remarkable memories of a handful of program managers.

Eventually, organizations realize they aren't managing an advocacy program at all. They're managing lists that happen to contain advocates.

But the shortcomings are real:

  • A spreadsheet might tell you that Sarah from ABC Company has spoken at a conference. It couldn't tell you that she'd spoken three times already this quarter.
  • Custom CRM fields could tell you a customer was referenceable. They alone couldn't coordinate approvals, notify relationship owners, recognize participation, measure outcomes, or attribute revenue.

Purpose-built advocacy platforms emerged because advocacy is much more than a search problem.

Ironically, AI has convinced some organizations to revisit the same shortcut they worked so hard to escape.

When Search Replaces Process

Let's imagine two different worlds.

In the first, AI recommends an advocate for a sales call.

  1. A request is automatically created.
  2. The Customer Success Manager approves participation.
  3. The customer receives preparation materials.
  4. The call takes place.
  5. The activity is recorded.
  6. Recognition is issued.
  7. The opportunity is linked to the advocacy activity.
  8. If the deal closes, revenue attribution updates automatically.
  9. Executive dashboards reflect the contribution.

Months later, AI knows this customer recently participated and may deserve a break before being asked again.

Now imagine the second world.

  1. AI recommends the same advocate.
  2. The salesperson sends an email.
  3. The customer agrees.
  4. The meeting happens.
  5. Everyone moves on.

Three months later someone asks how many customer reference contributed to the revenue this quarter.

Silence. Nobody really knows.

The advocacy happened...hopefully. The program didn't. Collectively, the organization slowly stopped feeding the very system it depended on to understand its advocacy program.

Reality Check
If AI helps facilitate twenty closed-won opportunities this quarter, but none are recorded, your executive dashboard still says zero.

Invisible Work Stays Invisible

One of the easiest mistakes to make in an AI-first world is assuming that successful interactions somehow become organizational knowledge on their own.

They don't.

If a customer agrees to speak with a prospect and nobody records it, the organization loses far more than a single activity.

  • It loses context, attribution, and recognition.
  • It loses another piece of history that could have helped improve the next decision.

The most valuable advocacy data isn't simply who your customers are.

It's everything they've done.

  • Every request, acceptance/decline, event presentation, analyst interview, product beta, reference call, press interview, reward, closed-won opportunity revenue influenced by their participation.

That's the story AI actually wants to read.

AI Needs Memory, Not Just Data

It's often said that AI needs good data.

That's true.

But operational history is far more valuable than static customer information.

  • Advocate profiles answer questions about who someone is.
  • Operational history answers questions about what consistently works.
  • That's where AI begins uncovering insights that no spreadsheet could ever reveal.
  • Perhaps healthcare advocates participate twice as often as financial services advocates.
  • Perhaps customers who join advisory boards are twice as likely to become conference speakers.
  • Maybe advocates who receive recognition within a week participate significantly more often than those who don't.

Those aren't search results.Those are patterns.

  • Patterns emerge from history.
  • History emerges from process.
  • Process emerges from systems.

Remove any one of those pieces and AI becomes little more than an exceptionally fast search engine.

Reality Check
Every workflow skipped today is a pattern AI won't discover tomorrow.

Don't Stop at "Who?"

The AI revolution has created tremendous excitement, and rightly so. Finding the right advocate is becoming dramatically easier than it was only a few years ago.

That's worth celebrating.

Just don't confuse a better search experience with a better advocacy program. Search is only one chapter in the story.

The organizations that see the greatest return from AI won't necessarily be the ones with the most sophisticated models.

They'll be the ones with the richest operational history.

  • Every request becomes institutional memory.
  • Every activity measured.
  • Every contribution attributable.
  • Every outcome becomes another lesson AI can learn from.

Those organizations won't use AI merely to answer the question, "Who should we ask?"

They'll use AI to answer far more valuable questions.

  • "Where are we running short of advocates?"
  • "When is the most effective time to use advocates?"
  • "What types of advocacy generate the greatest business impact?"
  • "What patterns have we been missing?"

That's when AI stops behaving like a better Google search.

That's when it starts behaving like a strategic partner.

Finding the right advocate has always been the opening scene.

If your AI can find advocates but your program can't learn from using them, you've built a remarkable search engine instead of a remarkable advocacy program.