Resourcesicon
Ensuring Quality and Impact of Nomination Campaign
Megaphone saying Nominate your custmers with arrow to finger on people image with arrow to VIP member.

Ensuring Quality and Impact of Nomination Campaign

Customer advocate nomination campaigns are a proven, quick method for identifying customers who are highly satisfied and enthusiastic about your solution. They’re useful for building, rebuilding and filling gaps in your customer advocate database—the foundation of any program.

You can count on advocates changing jobs. You can expect Sales goals to shift to new areas of emphasis throughout the year. And you know you’ll need to combat emerging, competitive threats through credible advocate testimonials. A constant flow of new, energetic members is vital to consistently support your organization’s advocate demands.

Following is a planning guide packed with best practices to ensure your nomination campaign is precise and meets your objectives.

Identify Needs

The place to begin is with an assessment of current needs and/or gaps. This will help you size up the type of support and promotion that’ll be necessary. A campaign with a goal of 50 very specific candidates is quite different than a goal of 500 spanning 10 different segments.

The basic objective of a nomination campaign is to recruit customers who will advance company growth goals; current and near future. That means advocate success narratives that align with specific tactics such as increased focus on a particular industry, geography, partnerships, new products, and so on. A blanket request for nominations will result in a lot of irrelevant submissions, an avoidable waste of time and effort for everyone involved.

Set specific criteria for what makes a quality nomination. For example:

  • Personas/Titles
  • Products
  • Geographies
  • Industries
  • Tenure with your product
  • Use Cases
  • Activities (willing to do PR, provide sales references, speak at events, etc.)

Choose Audience

A nomination campaign could be run internally (customer success, account management, sales), or externally (customers). What’s right for your situation? Internal campaigns work well when your co-workers have solid relationships with customers, and there’s a culture of cooperation and participation, which requires strong leadership support. If there’s been a lot of turnover amongst the primary relationship owners, whether Sales or customer success, then you might choose to go directly to customers. Going this route can often have a political element as your effort might be seen as end running relationship owners. Resistance can be mollified by pointing out that less time and effort will be required of the relationship owners.

Utilize existing customer data to identify potential advocates to shortlist candidates. Consider NPS and traditional customer satisfaction survey results, engagement metrics, NPS scores, influence in their industry, and other relevant data points​​.

Motivation: incentives/rewards

This is most likely a part of the plan that will require leadership approval. Rewards come with a price tag. So, make a best guess estimate of rewards costs and volume of nominations and have that ready for leadership review.

You’ll reach your goal a lot faster if you incentivize the nominators. Roll the nomination campaign into an existing rewards program, or launch a new program for nominations. Talk to co-workers or customers and make sure the rewards you choose will motivate participation.

For salespeople, cash is king. Spiffs should be for qualified nominations to ensure quality. The amount has to be considered in the context of other incentives, and crafted to grab their attention. Is that $50, $100, $250? Is the number higher for the first X submissions? Is there a larger prize for the stakeholder(s) who nominated the most qualified submissions (e.g., $2,500)? Maybe there’s a drawing for one or more prizes to the top X nominators? There’s lots of room for creativity, just be sure to keep the rules easy-to-understand. We’ve got plenty of additional ideas in this blog post.

There are non-monetary benefits that motivate account owners. These include benefits for their customers (see below), better protection/less overuse of their customers, less time spent finding and making use of advocates, and more choice ensuring the best possible match for each need.

For customer-direct campaigns, becoming part of the advocacy program should have benefits that are clear and well-communicated. These benefits tend to be less transactional, designed to create stronger bonds with the company such as increased visibility, peer networking, access to executives, exclusive event access, roadmap input, early access to new features, and other perks​​. Again, more ideas may be found here.

Leadership’s Role

Like most cross-functional, as well as customer-facing initiatives, having leadership support is often a pivotal factor. Senior leadership must provide visible support and secure the cooperation of line managers (especially Sales and Customer Success), where the rubber meets the road. Do not underestimate how important this group of managers are to participation from your end-users. Nomination campaign announcements have to come from these managers, and ideally include what is to be gained (or lost) from high (or low) participation.

Logistics

You don’t want any SNAFUs after the campaign is launched. Have your processes in place, tested and ready to execute before the first nominations start coming in. Time is of the essence. Set SLAs for each step. You may have unique aspects to your campaign, but here is a list of activities that apply to any campaign.

  • How to collect
    Ideally, nominations are collected through a web form in order to standardize data collection, and streamline the process for the nominator. Whatever your collection method, reviewing and acting on each submission in a timely fashion is essential.
  • How to qualify and onboard
    Every program manager will have a different preference when it comes to this step. Will there be a 1:1 call with each prospective advocate—whether nominated by a CSM or the customer herself? Will that call be purely a welcome, or used as an opportunity to ensure every advocacy opportunity is explored? Alternatively, perhaps a simple email confirmation and thank you is deemed sufficient?
  • Follow up
    Regardless of the submission follow up approach, what will the SLA be: 2-4 hours from submission, 24 hours, 48 hours? Letting nominations sit on a shelf is frustrating to those who nominated, or self-nominated. Side note: Once a customer is activated as an advocate in the program, get them into use. If a customer agrees to be an advocate, don’t let them sit idle for long.
  • Reward issuance
    What will the turnaround be for issuing the reward? Is there an order that must be placed? If so, by whom? You want to minimize the lag between the activity and reward.

Communication Plan

You can have the best campaign ever, but a lack of awareness will spell its doom.

Clear communications concerning the campaign will determine the results. Create a multi-channel plan using any and all channels available to get the word out (Teams/Slack, email, social media, in-product prompts, etc.). There may be several rounds of communications with goals of creating buzz, educating, and, of course, conveying the “what’s in it for me?” for the nominator. Address each of the following as part of your plan:

  • The goal
    This might be something like: Our goal is to add 150 new customer advocates in the following segments who will participate as event speakers, sales references, and interview subjects for press, videos and case studies. That’s the big picture.
  • The criteria
    You want quality versus quantity. Be specific. For example: We are looking for director level technical managers that have been customers for at least 3 years, in the technology, healthcare and financial services industries, have an HR use case, with North American HQs, and use product A, B or C. These are the particulars.
  • The timeframe
    We believe shorter is better. If the campaign runs for 2 months vs. 2 weeks, you will see activity in week one, a trickle, then a modest spike in week 8. A narrow timeframe maintains focus and energy, and you get what you need more quickly so you can move forward. Dragging out this process in the interest of not overburdening the nominators does not yield a better campaign result. It only delays the availability of qualified advocates for marketing and sales initiatives.
  • The process
    Nomination directions should be simple and clear. Complexity will reduce participation. Be sure anyone can understand where to go, what’s needed, and what happens after submission. Test those directions on a subset of your audience, don’t assume.
  • Potential benefits
    Be sure the rules of the game are clear, easy to understand. Again, test the description of rewards on a subset of your audience, don’t assume. Use engaging content like videos, infographics, and blog posts to explain the advocacy program and reasons to participate.

In Flight Engagement

Once live, campaign performance should be monitored closely. Soliciting feedback from participants will identify any “hitches” in the process. Maybe the issue is unclear instruction, or you’re getting nominations that are off-base, or there’s a technical glitch with the web nomination form. These issues must be addressed quickly, with a sense of urgency.

For internal campaigns it’s useful to leverage the competitive nature of salespeople if they’re part of the campaign. A leaderboard accomplishes this need nicely.

Track the performance of your nomination campaign. Measure the number of nominations, the quality of nominees, and the overall impact on your advocacy program​​. Managers should receive periodic status reports on how their teams are doing in terms of the campaign goals. The nomination initiative is a topic on daily/weekly/monthly team meetings/calls for a month or more (often the program manager attends).

The Wrap

A well-executed nomination campaign is pivotal for building a robust customer advocate database. By setting clear objectives, defining specific criteria, and choosing the right audience, you ensure that your efforts are targeted and productive. Leadership support and a comprehensive communication plan are essential to drive participation and achieve your goals. Remember to incentivize nominators appropriately and maintain a seamless process from nomination to reward issuance. Regularly monitor campaign performance and address any issues promptly to keep momentum high. By following these best practices, you can create a dynamic and effective advocacy program that not only fills current gaps but also supports future growth and combats competitive threats with credible testimonials. Begin implementing these strategies in your nomination campaigns and knock your recruiting goals out of the park! Our team can help support these advocacy efforts through our supplemental staffing services, learn more today.

It Started With a Legitimate Aspiration

It's only natural that many advocacy leaders have landed on the same objective: make the program easier to use by meeting users where they're already working.

Today, that increasingly means Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or whatever generative AI assistant employees happen to have open.

Imagine a salesperson simply asking AI, "Find me three German healthcare customers using product Y, willing to speak with a prospect," instead of navigating to another interface, or waiting for someone from advocacy, or elsewhere, to respond. It's easy to see the appeal. Removing friction has always been one of the fastest ways to increase adoption.

It is exactly the right instinct.

The difficult parts, arguably the reason program managers exist, occur before and after AI says, "Here are your three best matches."

The value advocacy professionals bring is the ability to operationalize and scale customer advocacy for maximum impact. Quality advocate information doesn't just appear, it's the result of a system.

What's Next?

Now that the user has three advocates, what should happen?

  • Should they email the customer directly?
  • Should they contact the Customer Success Manager first?
  • The account executive for one of the accounts was about to make a request. Was that considered?
  • Has anyone noticed that this customer has already participated in three activities in the last 60 days?
  • Are they currently navigating a difficult support issue?
  • Did they recently decline another invitation?
  • Would someone else actually be a better choice?

Notice what happened. The search was completed.

The next steps are just as manual as ever if AI search is the be all, end all.

Reality Check
AI can tell you who could participate. It can't tell you who should participate unless someone (or something) has been keeping score.

Haven't We Seen This Movie Before?

This is where the story starts to feel strangely familiar.

Many companies still operate their program using spreadsheets, scattered CRM fields, shared drives, email folders, and the remarkable memories of a handful of program managers.

Eventually, organizations realize they aren't managing an advocacy program at all. They're managing lists that happen to contain advocates.

But the shortcomings are real:

  • A spreadsheet might tell you that Sarah from ABC Company has spoken at a conference. It couldn't tell you that she'd spoken three times already this quarter.
  • Custom CRM fields could tell you a customer was referenceable. They alone couldn't coordinate approvals, notify relationship owners, recognize participation, measure outcomes, or attribute revenue.

Purpose-built advocacy platforms emerged because advocacy is much more than a search problem.

Ironically, AI has convinced some organizations to revisit the same shortcut they worked so hard to escape.

When Search Replaces Process

Let's imagine two different worlds.

In the first, AI recommends an advocate for a sales call.

  1. A request is automatically created.
  2. The Customer Success Manager approves participation.
  3. The customer receives preparation materials.
  4. The call takes place.
  5. The activity is recorded.
  6. Recognition is issued.
  7. The opportunity is linked to the advocacy activity.
  8. If the deal closes, revenue attribution updates automatically.
  9. Executive dashboards reflect the contribution.

Months later, AI knows this customer recently participated and may deserve a break before being asked again.

Now imagine the second world.

  1. AI recommends the same advocate.
  2. The salesperson sends an email.
  3. The customer agrees.
  4. The meeting happens.
  5. Everyone moves on.

Three months later someone asks how many customer reference contributed to the revenue this quarter.

Silence. Nobody really knows.

The advocacy happened...hopefully. The program didn't. Collectively, the organization slowly stopped feeding the very system it depended on to understand its advocacy program.

Reality Check
If AI helps facilitate twenty closed-won opportunities this quarter, but none are recorded, your executive dashboard still says zero.

Invisible Work Stays Invisible

One of the easiest mistakes to make in an AI-first world is assuming that successful interactions somehow become organizational knowledge on their own.

They don't.

If a customer agrees to speak with a prospect and nobody records it, the organization loses far more than a single activity.

  • It loses context, attribution, and recognition.
  • It loses another piece of history that could have helped improve the next decision.

The most valuable advocacy data isn't simply who your customers are.

It's everything they've done.

  • Every request, acceptance/decline, event presentation, analyst interview, product beta, reference call, press interview, reward, closed-won opportunity revenue influenced by their participation.

That's the story AI actually wants to read.

AI Needs Memory, Not Just Data

It's often said that AI needs good data.

That's true.

But operational history is far more valuable than static customer information.

  • Advocate profiles answer questions about who someone is.
  • Operational history answers questions about what consistently works.
  • That's where AI begins uncovering insights that no spreadsheet could ever reveal.
  • Perhaps healthcare advocates participate twice as often as financial services advocates.
  • Perhaps customers who join advisory boards are twice as likely to become conference speakers.
  • Maybe advocates who receive recognition within a week participate significantly more often than those who don't.

Those aren't search results.Those are patterns.

  • Patterns emerge from history.
  • History emerges from process.
  • Process emerges from systems.

Remove any one of those pieces and AI becomes little more than an exceptionally fast search engine.

Reality Check
Every workflow skipped today is a pattern AI won't discover tomorrow.

Don't Stop at "Who?"

The AI revolution has created tremendous excitement, and rightly so. Finding the right advocate is becoming dramatically easier than it was only a few years ago.

That's worth celebrating.

Just don't confuse a better search experience with a better advocacy program. Search is only one chapter in the story.

The organizations that see the greatest return from AI won't necessarily be the ones with the most sophisticated models.

They'll be the ones with the richest operational history.

  • Every request becomes institutional memory.
  • Every activity measured.
  • Every contribution attributable.
  • Every outcome becomes another lesson AI can learn from.

Those organizations won't use AI merely to answer the question, "Who should we ask?"

They'll use AI to answer far more valuable questions.

  • "Where are we running short of advocates?"
  • "When is the most effective time to use advocates?"
  • "What types of advocacy generate the greatest business impact?"
  • "What patterns have we been missing?"

That's when AI stops behaving like a better Google search.

That's when it starts behaving like a strategic partner.

Finding the right advocate has always been the opening scene.

If your AI can find advocates but your program can't learn from using them, you've built a remarkable search engine instead of a remarkable advocacy program.