Resourcesicon
Customer Advocacy Best Practices for Program Manager Success
Silhouette of person with cape representing attributes of top performing advocacy program managers.

Customer Advocacy Best Practices for Program Manager Success

Customer Marketing & Advocacy (CMA) is a demanding profession. With a vast array of stakeholders with their own diverse needs, it often falls to a small team, sometimes just one person, to manage the program. Despite these challenges, many program managers achieve remarkable success measured by a variety of metrics unique to their organizations. So, how do these high performers manage to excel? After years of careful observation, we’ve concluded that their success stems from a combination of professional skills and personal attributes.

Professional Skills

These essential skills are not typically taught in college classrooms, but rather developed through mentoring, on-the-job training, and practical experience.

  • Change Management Acumen
    Change is never easy, and assuming that people will embrace it willingly is pure fantasy. Whether it’s a shift in process, technology, or policy, ignoring the human side of change is a recipe for failure. High-performing program managers excel in change management, ensuring that transitions are smooth, well-received and sustained.
  • Technical Proficiency
    Most marketing roles today demand technical competence because software and data are intrinsic to doing the jobs. In fact, the entire viability of an advocacy program revolves around the quality of the data. AI will make that even more so. So, “data nerd” in one form or another, will appear on most CMA job descriptions. Customer marketers learn quickly that, because they are under-resourced, technology is how they will scale and maintain their sanity. Being a deeply cross-functional position, the in-scope technology extends well beyond the customer advocacy solution. High performing programs seek to have systems of relevance to advocacy integrated in order to be more coordinated, informed and effective.
  • Deep Program Knowledge
    It goes without saying that the more time a program manager has been in their role, the wiser they are about our domain. This doesn’t come solely through their own experiences, but through knowledge-sharing opportunities (training courses, webinars, CMA events, etc.) with peers and through vendors. As a solution provider (20+ years now!), we’ve accumulated an immense library of what to do, and what not to do—best practices. By fully utilizing a wealth of best practices, they fast-track their growth compared to those who don’t.
  • Metrics-Driven Mindset
    Gone are the days when marketing was all about creativity without accountability. Today, high performers embrace measurability, understanding that every aspect of their program, from operations to strategic contributions, must be backed by data. They prioritize metrics that align with corporate goals, ensuring that their efforts are both impactful and recognized.
  • Leadership Alignment
    Also known as managing upward, this skill involves keeping leadership in sync with your vision, successes, challenges, and needs. While it ties into change management, it stands as a distinct discipline. High performers excel at understanding what drives their sponsors and tailoring their communications to keep multiple champions in leadership engaged and supportive.
  • Program Promotion
    Internal promotion of the CMA program is just as important as external marketing. High performers understand that promoting their program within the organization requires the same level of effort, persistence, and strategic focus as any external campaign. They apply marketing principles like audience understanding, multi-channel messaging, and social proof to ensure their program’s visibility and success.
  • Strategy and Execution
    High performers strike a balance between strategy and execution. We’ve seen programs with a great strategy and no execution, and programs with lots of activity but no strategy. Neither describe a high performing program. Strategy alone produces a terrific vision, but without execution it’s just an idea and nothing more. More often we see very busy people recruiting advocates, matchmaking advocates for various activities, producing or creating content, and facilitating communities (virtual or in-person) but all in a discrete, disconnected manner. All this activity should be appreciated and rewarded by leadership, right? However, as has proven to be the case over and over again, it isn’t. To count, it must correlate to the goals the CEO wakes up thinking about.

Personal Attributes

When we asked our customer success team to describe the most accomplished program leaders, these words emerged as the most frequent descriptors:

Passionate & Committed

This is the number one required characteristic of high performers. Makes sense doesn’t it? If someone isn’t that “into it,” how can they do great things? It’s really important to believe in the power of customer advocacy because this is not an easy role. Conviction about and dedication to what you’re doing gets you through the ups and downs while never losing sight of that north star.

Confident & Persuasive

Fake it till you make it can have a negative connotation. But, there is something to be said for approaching naysayers and blockers with a healthy dose of confidence. High performers recognize, intuitively or learned, the importance of self-assurance and belief while maintaining integrity and authenticity. On the flip side, if a program manager avoids asserting themself when it comes to making asks of  leadership, Sales management or IT, the program will suffer from a different and missing type of advocacy—self-advocacy.

Action-Oriented & Persistent

With so many balls to juggle, it’s understandable that sometimes the best laid plans don’t come to fruition. High performers are not only organized but also skilled negotiators and communicators. They remain aligned with top company objectives and find ways to complete the tasks that drive the most significant results, understanding that the details can make all the difference.

Collaborative & Empathetic

Effective program managers are collaborative by nature, working across nearly every function in the organization. They understand the importance of being consultative with stakeholders, listening to their needs, and maintaining strong relationships. By involving key departments like IT, Sales Enablement, and Customer Success early on, they ensure that when support is needed, it’s already in place.

The Wrap

In the ever-evolving world of Customer Marketing & Advocacy, the standout program managers are those who artfully weave professional savvy with personal fervor. They don’t just manage change—they orchestrate it, harnessing technology as their secret weapon and keeping leadership in their corner. What truly propels them, though, is an unshakable commitment, a knack for persuasion, and a collaborative edge that turns every interaction into an opportunity. By honing these rare skills and embracing the intricacies of their role, they transform hurdles into stepping stones and ideas into influential realities. The journey is challenging, but the rewards? Absolutely transformative.

It Started With a Legitimate Aspiration

It's only natural that many advocacy leaders have landed on the same objective: make the program easier to use by meeting users where they're already working.

Today, that increasingly means Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or whatever generative AI assistant employees happen to have open.

Imagine a salesperson simply asking AI, "Find me three German healthcare customers using product Y, willing to speak with a prospect," instead of navigating to another interface, or waiting for someone from advocacy, or elsewhere, to respond. It's easy to see the appeal. Removing friction has always been one of the fastest ways to increase adoption.

It is exactly the right instinct.

The difficult parts, arguably the reason program managers exist, occur before and after AI says, "Here are your three best matches."

The value advocacy professionals bring is the ability to operationalize and scale customer advocacy for maximum impact. Quality advocate information doesn't just appear, it's the result of a system.

What's Next?

Now that the user has three advocates, what should happen?

  • Should they email the customer directly?
  • Should they contact the Customer Success Manager first?
  • The account executive for one of the accounts was about to make a request. Was that considered?
  • Has anyone noticed that this customer has already participated in three activities in the last 60 days?
  • Are they currently navigating a difficult support issue?
  • Did they recently decline another invitation?
  • Would someone else actually be a better choice?

Notice what happened. The search was completed.

The next steps are just as manual as ever if AI search is the be all, end all.

Reality Check
AI can tell you who could participate. It can't tell you who should participate unless someone (or something) has been keeping score.

Haven't We Seen This Movie Before?

This is where the story starts to feel strangely familiar.

Many companies still operate their program using spreadsheets, scattered CRM fields, shared drives, email folders, and the remarkable memories of a handful of program managers.

Eventually, organizations realize they aren't managing an advocacy program at all. They're managing lists that happen to contain advocates.

But the shortcomings are real:

  • A spreadsheet might tell you that Sarah from ABC Company has spoken at a conference. It couldn't tell you that she'd spoken three times already this quarter.
  • Custom CRM fields could tell you a customer was referenceable. They alone couldn't coordinate approvals, notify relationship owners, recognize participation, measure outcomes, or attribute revenue.

Purpose-built advocacy platforms emerged because advocacy is much more than a search problem.

Ironically, AI has convinced some organizations to revisit the same shortcut they worked so hard to escape.

When Search Replaces Process

Let's imagine two different worlds.

In the first, AI recommends an advocate for a sales call.

  1. A request is automatically created.
  2. The Customer Success Manager approves participation.
  3. The customer receives preparation materials.
  4. The call takes place.
  5. The activity is recorded.
  6. Recognition is issued.
  7. The opportunity is linked to the advocacy activity.
  8. If the deal closes, revenue attribution updates automatically.
  9. Executive dashboards reflect the contribution.

Months later, AI knows this customer recently participated and may deserve a break before being asked again.

Now imagine the second world.

  1. AI recommends the same advocate.
  2. The salesperson sends an email.
  3. The customer agrees.
  4. The meeting happens.
  5. Everyone moves on.

Three months later someone asks how many customer reference contributed to the revenue this quarter.

Silence. Nobody really knows.

The advocacy happened...hopefully. The program didn't. Collectively, the organization slowly stopped feeding the very system it depended on to understand its advocacy program.

Reality Check
If AI helps facilitate twenty closed-won opportunities this quarter, but none are recorded, your executive dashboard still says zero.

Invisible Work Stays Invisible

One of the easiest mistakes to make in an AI-first world is assuming that successful interactions somehow become organizational knowledge on their own.

They don't.

If a customer agrees to speak with a prospect and nobody records it, the organization loses far more than a single activity.

  • It loses context, attribution, and recognition.
  • It loses another piece of history that could have helped improve the next decision.

The most valuable advocacy data isn't simply who your customers are.

It's everything they've done.

  • Every request, acceptance/decline, event presentation, analyst interview, product beta, reference call, press interview, reward, closed-won opportunity revenue influenced by their participation.

That's the story AI actually wants to read.

AI Needs Memory, Not Just Data

It's often said that AI needs good data.

That's true.

But operational history is far more valuable than static customer information.

  • Advocate profiles answer questions about who someone is.
  • Operational history answers questions about what consistently works.
  • That's where AI begins uncovering insights that no spreadsheet could ever reveal.
  • Perhaps healthcare advocates participate twice as often as financial services advocates.
  • Perhaps customers who join advisory boards are twice as likely to become conference speakers.
  • Maybe advocates who receive recognition within a week participate significantly more often than those who don't.

Those aren't search results.Those are patterns.

  • Patterns emerge from history.
  • History emerges from process.
  • Process emerges from systems.

Remove any one of those pieces and AI becomes little more than an exceptionally fast search engine.

Reality Check
Every workflow skipped today is a pattern AI won't discover tomorrow.

Don't Stop at "Who?"

The AI revolution has created tremendous excitement, and rightly so. Finding the right advocate is becoming dramatically easier than it was only a few years ago.

That's worth celebrating.

Just don't confuse a better search experience with a better advocacy program. Search is only one chapter in the story.

The organizations that see the greatest return from AI won't necessarily be the ones with the most sophisticated models.

They'll be the ones with the richest operational history.

  • Every request becomes institutional memory.
  • Every activity measured.
  • Every contribution attributable.
  • Every outcome becomes another lesson AI can learn from.

Those organizations won't use AI merely to answer the question, "Who should we ask?"

They'll use AI to answer far more valuable questions.

  • "Where are we running short of advocates?"
  • "When is the most effective time to use advocates?"
  • "What types of advocacy generate the greatest business impact?"
  • "What patterns have we been missing?"

That's when AI stops behaving like a better Google search.

That's when it starts behaving like a strategic partner.

Finding the right advocate has always been the opening scene.

If your AI can find advocates but your program can't learn from using them, you've built a remarkable search engine instead of a remarkable advocacy program.